Firestorm in Israel, as Law Change Could End Netanyahu Charges

Plan to scrap offence sparks backlash during PM’s trial

Header Image

Strong reactions have been triggered in Israel by the government majority’s intention to abolish the criminal offence of “fraud and breach of trust” from the Penal Code, while Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s trial is ongoing.

According to Israeli media, if the amendment is passed in time, it could lead to the annulment of the charges against Netanyahu in all three cases he faces – known as Cases 1000, 2000 and 4000 – as the law provides that criminal liability ceases when an offence is repealed.

Vague law

Those promoting the bill argue that the offence is a vague and problematic “general” provision that allows arbitrary and selective prosecution of politicians and public officials. They maintain that existing legislation already provides sufficient and clearer tools to combat corruption, such as bribery and money laundering offences.

They also propose that certain issues currently covered by the provision should instead be addressed through disciplinary or ethical mechanisms.

Corruption a 'new normal'

The opposition has condemned the initiative as an institutional coup and an attempt to shield the prime minister from justice. It has announced political and social mobilisation to force the withdrawal of the bill.

Critics warn that the move risks undermining the rule of law and turning corruption into a “new normal” in Israeli public life.

The bill is expected to be brought before the legislative committee in the near future, with the government seeking its rapid passage. This comes amid concerns over a possible dissolution of the Knesset ahead of elections.

Comments Posting Policy

The owners of the website www.politis.com.cy reserve the right to remove reader comments that are defamatory and/or offensive, or comments that could be interpreted as inciting hate/racism or that violate any other legislation. The authors of these comments are personally responsible for their publication. If a reader/commenter whose comment is removed believes that they have evidence proving the accuracy of its content, they can send it to the website address for review. We encourage our readers to report/flag comments that they believe violate the above rules. Comments that contain URLs/links to any site are not published automatically.