Parliament to Revisit Protest Law After Clashes Outside Foreign Ministry

Header Image

Formal complaints move ahead, police defend tactics, and MPs fast-track a review of the public-assemblies law.

Following Thursday night’s clashes outside the Foreign Ministry, protesters say they are filing written complaints to the Independent Authority for the Investigation of Allegations and Complaints Against the Police (AIDIPA). Police maintain officers acted to restore order after both traffic lanes were blocked, stressing that “proportionate force” and personal pepper spray were used when crowd members resisted.

Law in the dock on Monday

The House Human Rights Committee will place the public-assemblies law under scrutiny on Monday, citing concerns flagged in an OSCE (Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe) legal opinion. MPs will examine how the statute treats spontaneous demonstrations linked to urgent events and whether operational guidance to police is clear enough to prevent escalation. Options on the table range from targeted amendments to wider revisions for alignment with international standards.

Participants insist the gathering was peaceful and say force was abrupt and excessive, reporting pepper-spray exposure and rough handling. Police dispute that officers told protesters to enter the road and say attempts to identify an organiser on site failed before reinforcements were called. The gap between these narratives will be central to both AIDIPA’s review and parliamentary questioning.

Journalist treatment under scrutiny

A Palestinian-Cypriot reporter, Bissan Ibrahim, alleges she was twice knocked down and sprayed despite repeatedly identifying herself as press. Her account, backed by widely shared footage, has intensified calls for updated crowd-management protocols and explicit safeguards for journalists working at protests.

AIDIPA is expected to register and assess submissions from attendees alleging disproportionate force, while on Monday the parliamentary committee will begin examining possible legal changes, including clearer rules for spontaneous protests and on-site liaison procedures. The police, meanwhile, have invited written complaints and continue to stand by their position that safety and traffic management drove the operation.

The immediate question is accountability for Thursday’s operation. The broader test is whether Cyprus’ protest framework -law and practice- can protect peaceful assembly, ensure public safety and guarantee press freedom without resorting to tactics that erode public trust.