Attalides: Minister’s Reply on Cyprus’ Habitats Directive Compliance Is Inadequate

Volt Cyprus MP Alexandra Attalides urges a public, milestone-based plan and stronger institutional and financial support for the Environment Department.

Header Image

POLITIS NEWS

Volt Cyprus MP Alexandra Attalides has raised serious concerns about delays in implementing Directive 92/43/EEC on habitats and Natura 2000 sites, following the Agriculture, Rural Development and Environment Minister’s response to her parliamentary question. According to the Minister’s update, only 11 of the 37 required Management Decrees have been issued so far, with full completion pledged by the end of 2025. Attalides’ statement says progress remains slow, citing “technical constraints” and “coordination issues” between services.

EU infringement context

Attalides notes that the Republic of Cyprus was referred to the Court of Justice of the European Union in March 2024 for failing to apply the required protection measures for Natura 2000 areas. She stresses that the Habitats Directive is a cornerstone of the European Green Deal and the EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030. Continued inaction, she argues, endangers Cyprus’ natural heritage and could lead to significant financial penalties from the EU.

Calls for action

The MP calls on the Minister to publish a detailed compliance plan with clear milestones and on the government to bolster the Environment Department both institutionally and financially. She also urges the European Commission to closely monitor Cyprus’ path to full implementation of the Directive.

“Protecting nature and biodiversity is not a barrier to development, but a precondition for a sustainable and fair society,” Attalides concludes.

Comments Posting Policy

The owners of the website www.politis.com.cy reserve the right to remove reader comments that are defamatory and/or offensive, or comments that could be interpreted as inciting hate/racism or that violate any other legislation. The authors of these comments are personally responsible for their publication. If a reader/commenter whose comment is removed believes that they have evidence proving the accuracy of its content, they can send it to the website address for review. We encourage our readers to report/flag comments that they believe violate the above rules. Comments that contain URLs/links to any site are not published automatically.