The overarching objective of the Trilateral cooperation schemes - as repeatedly underlined by Benjamin Netanyahu, Kyriakos Mitsotakis and Nikos Christodoulides, is the creation of conditions of security and cooperation in the wider Middle East region. At the same time, the trilateral framework focuses on key sectors such as energy, defence, innovation and tourism.
Within this context, as reaffirmed again yesterday, there is a consistent effort to further strengthen the so-called “3+1” format, with the participation of the United States, as part of a broader dynamic of regional integration aimed at reinforcing the role of the Eastern Mediterranean as a bridge of strategic, energy and economic connectivity.
This, however, is not an easy undertaking as long as the Trilateral initiatives are perceived as a closed club of countries in the Eastern Mediterranean. Before even discussing the prospect of a permanent US presence in the format, other steps should arguably precede it. For example, efforts should be made to transform the framework into a quadrilateral through the permanent inclusion of Egypt, while invitations to Lebanon and Turkey should also be considered necessary.
We recognise the diplomatic difficulties involved in convening such a forum. Nevertheless, the initiative might be seen as more realistic if, alongside the United States, the European Union were also invited to participate.
Why is it important to “open up” the Trilateral format? Because for some time now - partly due to the actions of the participating states themselves, but also due to third countries such as Turkey - a narrative has been cultivated suggesting that the three countries are conspiring against others in the region.
Anyone following Turkish television coverage will note the persistent attempt to create the impression that Israel, Cyprus and Greece are seeking to encircle and isolate Turkey. Although this perception is inaccurate, it renders any step towards rapprochement and cooperation with Turkey counterproductive.
Cyprus, in particular, if President Christodoulides’ stated readiness to move towards a solution of the Cyprus problem is genuine, has an obligation to send clear and positive messages to all parties regarding its willingness to cooperate.