Aristotelous' Lawyer Challenges Probe Independence

Attorney says Assistant Chief of Police’s involvement undermines impartiality; asks AG to remove the case from Police jurisdiction.

Header Image

POLITIS NEWS

A new letter to the Attorney General, George Savvides, has been sent by Christos Triantafyllides, counsel to Anna Aristotelous, voicing strong objection, on behalf of his client, to the decision to keep the case under police investigation.

According to the letter, the involvement of the Assistant Chief of Police and other members of the Force “removes from the process the possibility of an objective and, subjectively, independent judgment,” and “leads to contamination of the investigative procedures.”

Calls for independence and use of criminal investigators

Triantafyllides warns that the Attorney General’s decision “inevitably leads to at least a lack of objective independence regarding the decisions to be taken by the Legal Service” and may also affect any potential court proceedings “in the extreme hypothetical case that such proceedings are decided upon, under Articles 113 and 114 of the Constitution.” He argues that both investigative authorities and the Legal Service must remain above any suspicion of bias, since “public trust in Justice is the citizen’s last bulwark and must be safeguarded.”

Criticism of the Legal Service’s 10 October statement

The lawyer adds that the Legal Service’s public announcement on 10 October 2025 “does nothing to reverse this very worrying situation” and, on the contrary, “intensifies concern.” Triantafyllides concludes that his client “reserves all her legal rights,” noting that, following publication of the previous letter on 6 October, “trust in the Legal Service cannot be taken for granted.”

The letter was also copied to the President of the Republic, Nikos Christodoulides, and to the Minister of Justice and Public Order, Marios Hartsiotis.

Comments Posting Policy

The owners of the website www.politis.com.cy reserve the right to remove reader comments that are defamatory and/or offensive, or comments that could be interpreted as inciting hate/racism or that violate any other legislation. The authors of these comments are personally responsible for their publication. If a reader/commenter whose comment is removed believes that they have evidence proving the accuracy of its content, they can send it to the website address for review. We encourage our readers to report/flag comments that they believe violate the above rules. Comments that contain URLs/links to any site are not published automatically.