Cyprus Officials Are Dodging Journalists, and the Press Union Has Had Enough

The Cyprus Journalists' Union has condemned a growing pattern of government and state officials refusing to take questions from the press, citing two specific incidents in the past week and warning that the practice erodes transparency and public accountability.

Header Image

The Board of the Cyprus Journalists' Union (ESK) has expressed serious concern over what it describes as an increasing tendency among government and state officials to avoid answering questions from journalists, warning that the practice undermines transparency, erodes public information and weakens critical scrutiny of public affairs.

The statement cites two specific incidents. On 16 April 2026, Police Chief Themistos Arnaouttis called journalists for a press statement but refused to take their questions. Then, following the cabinet session of 21 April 2026, journalists waited in vain for any statement from officials. None was made, despite the fact that the session had produced the significant decision to invite an FBI team to Cyprus. The ESK's board noted that by avoiding a statement, officials also avoided what might have been uncomfortable questions.

The union's board called on all state and government officials to understand that journalists are not simply recorders of statements. "Journalists investigate, question, seek, wonder and frequently dissent, acting on behalf of the public and in the service of the public interest," the statement reads. "Journalists have a duty to ask and officials have an obligation to answer. Both engage in public discourse and are therefore judged publicly, journalists for the quality of their questions, officials for the content of their answers." The board described the ability to pose journalistic questions as non-negotiable.

Comments Posting Policy

The owners of the website www.politis.com.cy reserve the right to remove reader comments that are defamatory and/or offensive, or comments that could be interpreted as inciting hate/racism or that violate any other legislation. The authors of these comments are personally responsible for their publication. If a reader/commenter whose comment is removed believes that they have evidence proving the accuracy of its content, they can send it to the website address for review. We encourage our readers to report/flag comments that they believe violate the above rules. Comments that contain URLs/links to any site are not published automatically.