Ombudswoman Slams Education Ministry Over Harassment Case

"Never before has any ministry or body refused to provide us with information”

Header Image

ANDRIA GEORGIOU

The Ombudswoman, Maria Stylianou Lottidou, described as “unprecedented” the refusal of the Education Ministry to provide her office with the file of a sexual harassment complaint, arguing that the stance undermines the role of the Ombudswoman.

According to Lottidou, her office requested the file last November in order to examine complaints lodged by two ministry officials against a senior colleague. “Never, with any other agency, organisation or ministry, have we asked for information and been refused,” she told Politis.

Delay Blocks Investigation

The Commissioner warned that the delay has rendered any disciplinary inquiry impossible, as the case is now before the courts: “The law is clear. Once a complaint is before the judiciary, any disciplinary investigation is suspended. So even if we receive the file today, we cannot investigate further.”

She added that in the last three years (2022–2025) her office has handled 13 sexual harassment cases, but this is the first time a ministry has withheld information.

Ministry Defends Procedures

Education Minister Athina Michaelidou defended her ministry’s handling of the matter, insisting that procedures were followed and rejecting suggestions of a cover-up.

“There is no such case,” she said on state television. “Specific regulations were followed. He was entitled to promotion once the case was closed. While the disciplinary process was ongoing, the officer was removed from his duties, as provided by law.”

However, correspondence seen by Politis shows that the senior official in question remained in post until very recently.

Comments Posting Policy

The owners of the website www.politis.com.cy reserve the right to remove reader comments that are defamatory and/or offensive, or comments that could be interpreted as inciting hate/racism or that violate any other legislation. The authors of these comments are personally responsible for their publication. If a reader/commenter whose comment is removed believes that they have evidence proving the accuracy of its content, they can send it to the website address for review. We encourage our readers to report/flag comments that they believe violate the above rules. Comments that contain URLs/links to any site are not published automatically.