Alekos Tryfonides, MP with DIPA - the Democratic Alignment - Cooperation, admits to coordination issues between the governing coalition parties and the administration and confirms that political dialogue around uniting the centre continues. Regarding President Christodoulides’ ties with ELAM, he offers a diplomatically vague response.
When asked to assess the current level of communication and cooperation between the President, the Presidential Office, and the coalition parties, Tryfonides says:
“There is significant room for improvement. Despite existing problems - something even the President acknowledged at our recent party congress, taking primary responsibility for the lack of adequate communication - there has been some progress.
That said, we expect both the President and government ministers to take fresh initiatives and decisive steps to improve and deepen our political cooperation, to the benefit of citizens and effective governance.”
Underperforming ministers
Should there be a cabinet reshuffle?
“Absolutely. A reshuffle is necessary to bring a sense of renewal to the government. Some ministers bear political responsibility for the recent wildfires – even if they haven’t admitted it – and the President himself has said serious mistakes and omissions were made, which led to the destruction of 15 rural communities in Limassol’s hill regions. Additionally, some ministers – despite their efforts – clearly lack the necessary capabilities.”
Has the reshuffle come too late?
“Definitely. It should have happened long ago.”
What kind of government is the Christodoulides administration? Some say it’s more of a DISY offshoot than a coalition of the parties that supported him.
“It’s a coalition government. It includes members from various political backgrounds, including from the Democratic Rally (DISY). The government is judged on its policies – that’s what we focus on.”
Christodoulides and ELAM
What is the nature of the relationship between President Christodoulides and ELAM? Why is he appointing individuals linked to the far-right party?
“It’s the President’s prerogative to appoint whoever he believes is competent. Yes, there are capable individuals in every political space, and their work will ultimately speak for itself.
However, I won’t hide my discomfort and concern over the fact that some of the President’s supporters have since aligned with ELAM. I believe such political moves could hurt the President in the medium term.”
Why support a government you're not satisfied with?
“We support the policies we agree with – particularly those we helped shape. Where we disagree, we raise our objections institutionally, along with our own well-documented proposals. We believe our contributions can lead to better outcomes for citizens.”
Should DIPA remain in government?
“Our support is based on a programme agreement – not unconditional. We haven’t given anyone a blank cheque.
We remain a constructive coalition partner, aiming to influence key areas like the Cyprus problem, the economy, health, education, rural development, transparency, accountability, anti-corruption and social cohesion.
If we ever feel we are no longer useful, or if key agreements are not honoured, we won’t hesitate to re-evaluate our position. For us, the public interest outweighs cabinet posts.”
DIPA–DIKO: A United Centre?
Why not pursue a merger or closer cooperation with DIKO, given the lack of substantial policy differences?
“We are always open to dialogue. Our priority is strengthening the political Centre based on programme convergence, not communications stunts or opportunistic deals.
A strong centrist force is more necessary than ever. Historically, when the authentic Centre was strong – balancing Left and Right – the country fared better. Consensus, dialogue and synthesis must lead the way to deliver more benefits for Cyprus and its citizens.”
Is the DIPA–DIKO unification effort dead?
“Political dialogue never ends. Any merger or collaboration requires agreement, especially on major issues like the Cyprus problem and socioeconomic policy, where differences remain – though I don’t believe they are insurmountable. If we all prioritise the common good, a united Centre could well emerge for the benefit of the country.”
When will DIPA's candidate list for the May 2026 parliamentary elections be ready?
“We’re at an advanced stage. The process is ongoing and focused on careful evaluation and respect for society. Our aim is a diverse, representative slate featuring people with integrity, social standing, and a genuine will to contribute. We’re not chasing headlines, we care about substance. We expect the final list by the end of November, and I’m optimistic it will resonate with the broader public.”
A Parliamentary Player
What is DIPA goal for the May elections? Beyond simply entering Parliament, what would be a satisfying result?
“Entering Parliament is essential – but not just to exist. We want to be useful. We aim to represent moderation, consensus and seriousness, and to offer responsible solutions on the Cyprus issue, the economy and transparency.
We want to become a credible and institutional player in the centrist space, with concrete proposals and a role in future coalitions. As for our percentage, despite a tough political environment, we aim to match or exceed our last electoral performance. Our goal is to enter Parliament with stronger momentum. Every vote of confidence motivates us to work harder and gives us a stronger mandate to influence policy.”
Will DIPA-Cooperation make it back into Parliament?
“Our movement has proven its resilience and ability to achieve notable results, even in a polarised political landscape. We’ve stayed true to our principles and independent course, focused on responsible politics and constructive dialogue. We listen to citizens’ frustrations and concerns – and yes, they will shape the political scene.
But we remain a steady, moderate force, committed to unity and inclusive politics. With public support, we believe DIPA–Cooperation will be part of the next Parliament makeup - not just as a presence, but as a meaningful contributor to policy-making. That’s why we continue the daily work with honesty, clarity and belief in our mission.”
Will you stand again as a parliamentary candidate?
“Absolutely. I will be seeking re-election with full commitment. I’ve assessed my work in Parliament and have always been guided by improving citizens’ lives and advancing policies that serve the public interest and social cohesion.
With my broad parliamentary record and hands-on work tackling major issues – from economic and housing challenges to education, health and rural development – I intend to continue serving with integrity, energy and sound arguments for the good of our country and our people. I trust the voters of Nicosia District will support my continued contribution in Parliament.”
Final Stretch Before Elections: Priorities
What are your priorities in the final eight months before the May elections?
“This final stretch is a period of intensive work, not pre-election rhetoric. My top priorities remain solving the day-to-day problems faced by citizens and strengthening state institutions. I’ll continue to focus on social policy, supporting vulnerable groups and improving working and living conditions.
I also place great emphasis on boosting Parliament’s role in transparency, accountability, and oversight of the executive. I remain in direct contact with citizens, listening to their concerns, grievances and ideas – that connection is the most valuable tool an MP can have, especially when public trust in politics is so low.
For me, the campaign season doesn’t mean a pause – it means redoubling efforts. Key national issues like tax reform, education reform, special education, the demographic challenge and housing policy are on the table. I’ll work tirelessly and constructively, alongside colleagues, to ensure maximum benefit for the country and its citizens.
Trust is earned every day - not in the final hour.”
Does Parliament function as it should?
“Parliament plays a vital role in our democracy - it shapes decisions that define our country’s future. Yes, there are weaknesses and challenges, and always room for improvement. I believe Parliament could function better with more open and productive debate, greater transparency and a better understanding of public needs.
Strengthening inter-party collaboration and focusing on major societal issues is key. Parliament also needs institutional and procedural reforms to become more effective and citizen-focused. One step in this direction would be live broadcasting of parliamentary committee sessions.”