Özuslu Sees “Pre-Election Motives” Behind Two-State "Resolution"

He warned that the “two-state” line could undermine rights and arrangements secured through the Cyprus settlement process.

Header Image

TC CTP politician Sami Özuslu argued that the initiative was timed to influence the upcoming elections.

POLITIS NEWS

Turkish Cypriot party CTP representative Sami Özuslu has accused the ruling National Unity Party (UBP) of promoting the “two-state solution” resolution for pre-election gain, describing it as a “well-packaged plan for division.”

His remarks came as the “parliamentary committee on legal, political, foreign and defence affairs” in the"parliament" in the north approved the draft resolution by majority vote, with support from UBP “MPs.”

According to Turkish Cypriot online media, Özuslu argued that the initiative was politically motivated and timed to influence the upcoming elections. He said the founding text of regime in the north does not prevent negotiations for a federal settlement, on the contrary, it presupposes them, and warned that the proposal could raise issues of “unconstitutionality” and non-compliance with the “internal rules.”

He added that no representative of the “Attorney General’s Office” was present during the session and revealed that the name of Ersin Tatar had initially been included in the draft during the pre-election restriction period, something he called “illegal” and punishable by up to two years in prison. The name was later removed, he said.

Finally, Özuslu cautioned that the “two-state” line could jeopardise rights and arrangements gained through the settlement process, such as crossing facilitation, the Green Line Regulation, and aspects of EU acquis implementation, potentially returning Turkish Cypriots to pre-2004 conditions. He proposed that the issue be debated in the “plenary,” with the participation of Ersin Tatar.

CNA

Comments Posting Policy

The owners of the website www.politis.com.cy reserve the right to remove reader comments that are defamatory and/or offensive, or comments that could be interpreted as inciting hate/racism or that violate any other legislation. The authors of these comments are personally responsible for their publication. If a reader/commenter whose comment is removed believes that they have evidence proving the accuracy of its content, they can send it to the website address for review. We encourage our readers to report/flag comments that they believe violate the above rules. Comments that contain URLs/links to any site are not published automatically.