Nikos Sykas to Challenge DISY Decision at Supreme Constitutional Court

MP disputes exclusion from party ballot, citing presumption of innocence and lack of due process

Header Image

MP Nikos Sykas intends to file an appeal with the Supreme Constitutional Court of Cyprus, challenging the decision of the Democratic Rally (DISY) to exclude him from the party’s ballot following a complaint by a woman alleging assault.

The move was confirmed on Alpha Cyprus’ morning programme by his lawyer, Christos Pourgouridis.

Cooperation with police and legal review

According to Pourgouridis, his client has already given a statement to the police and responded to all questions posed by investigators. He added that instructions have been given to his law office to study the case in order to determine whether the legal requirements for a court appeal are met.

Presumption of innocence and natural justice

Pourgouridis said that, at first glance, the party’s decision appears to violate the presumption of innocence and fundamental principles of natural justice, as Sykas was not given the opportunity to be heard prior to the decision.

He stressed that complaints do not always lead to confirmation and described the party’s decision as “hasty”.

Role of party bodies and Supreme Court ruling

The lawyer also pointed out that the matter could have been examined by the party’s Ethics Committee. He further noted that, in its decision on lifting parliamentary immunity, the Supreme Court did not examine the substance of the complaint, but only the right of the police to investigate it.

Voters should decide, lawyer says

Pourgouridis described it as excessive to invoke the Supreme Court’s decision as justification for excluding Sykas from the ballot. He argued that judgment should ultimately be left to the voters.

As he noted, nothing stated by the MP in his testimony, in his view, justified the decision taken by the party’s Political Bureau.

Comments Posting Policy

The owners of the website www.politis.com.cy reserve the right to remove reader comments that are defamatory and/or offensive, or comments that could be interpreted as inciting hate/racism or that violate any other legislation. The authors of these comments are personally responsible for their publication. If a reader/commenter whose comment is removed believes that they have evidence proving the accuracy of its content, they can send it to the website address for review. We encourage our readers to report/flag comments that they believe violate the above rules. Comments that contain URLs/links to any site are not published automatically.