Fake News in Cyprus on the Rise During War

The Fact Check Cyprus coordinator told Politis radio that seven “stories” were debunked in 11 days, raising the alarm on the increase in and improved quality of deepfake videos, making them harder to detect.

Header Image

 

An unprecedented surge in false news and deepfake videos has been observed since the start of the war in Iran, according to Michalis Sirivianos, assistant professor at the Cyprus University of Technology (CUT) and coordinator of the Fact Check Cyprus page.

Speaking on Politis radio’s ‘Second Look’ programme, Sirivianos said the phenomenon has intensified significantly, noting that even experienced journalists now struggle to determine whether a video is genuine.

The problem has affected Cyprus as well. Within eleven days of the war, “we have debunked more than seven stories relating to Cyprus,” he said. Circulating examples included a claim that nuclear weapons were being stored at RAF Akrotiri, and footage purportedly showing a drone strike on the British bases at Akrotiri which in fact depicted an attack in Haifa, Israel.

Citing international fact‑checking journalists, he described the scale of the problem as unprecedented. “We have broken all previous records in the proportion of deepfake videos that have gone viral,” he said, adding that such material has even reached television channels and newspapers.

He explained that in the past a fake video could be identified relatively quickly. “We needed about half an hour to work out whether a video was a deepfake,” he said, adding that today a well‑made deepfake may require “three full days of investigation” to confirm its authenticity.

The evolution of artificial intelligence has made producing such content far easier, he added. “AI models can now generate highly realistic video,” he said, noting that “material capable of fooling a major TV station can even be created on a mobile phone.”

 

Comments Posting Policy

The owners of the website www.politis.com.cy reserve the right to remove reader comments that are defamatory and/or offensive, or comments that could be interpreted as inciting hate/racism or that violate any other legislation. The authors of these comments are personally responsible for their publication. If a reader/commenter whose comment is removed believes that they have evidence proving the accuracy of its content, they can send it to the website address for review. We encourage our readers to report/flag comments that they believe violate the above rules. Comments that contain URLs/links to any site are not published automatically.