Eurostat: Cyprus Close to EU Average in E-Government Use in 2025

Just over 70% of people (16-74) in Cyprus use public websites or apps, compared to the EU average of 72%. The lowest use was recorded in Romania, where less than one in four citizens use public digital services, while Denmark came top of the table with a remarkable 98% usage.

Header Image

 

The share of people aged 16 to 74 in Cyprus who use public authority websites or apps reached 70.1% in 2025, just below the European Union average, according to the latest data published on Thursday by Eurostat.

Across the EU, 71.9% of citizens in the same age group used e-government services through public authority websites or applications in 2025. According to the data, this share increased by 1.9 percentage points compared with 2024 and by 4.3 percentage points compared with 2022, when the relevant data collection began.

According to Eurostat data, the highest levels of e-government use were recorded in Denmark (98.0%), Netherlands (96.2%), Finland (96.1%) and Sweden (96.0%). By contrast, the lowest shares were observed in Romania (24.1%), Bulgaria (36.0%) and Italy (57.7%).

The most common use of e-government services in the EU was searching for information on public services, benefits, legislation or opening hours, reported by 44.2% of users. This was followed by accessing personal information (41.3%) and submitting tax declarations (38.2%).

Citizens also used public authorities’ online services to make appointments or reservations (38.1%), download or print official forms (36.7%), and receive official communication or documents (36.6%).

Other uses included applying for official documents or certificates (20.8%), accessing public databases or registers (20.7%), submitting applications for benefits or other entitlements (18.1%), as well as filing requests, claims or complaints (5.7%).

 

Source: CNA

Comments Posting Policy

The owners of the website www.politis.com.cy reserve the right to remove reader comments that are defamatory and/or offensive, or comments that could be interpreted as inciting hate/racism or that violate any other legislation. The authors of these comments are personally responsible for their publication. If a reader/commenter whose comment is removed believes that they have evidence proving the accuracy of its content, they can send it to the website address for review. We encourage our readers to report/flag comments that they believe violate the above rules. Comments that contain URLs/links to any site are not published automatically.