Government Tables Two Bills on Foreclosures in Parliament

Binding decisions, insolvency pathways and extended timelines included in proposals

Header Image

 

The Ministry of Finance has submitted two bills to Parliament aimed at reforming the framework governing foreclosures, introducing new mechanisms for dispute resolution and additional safeguards for borrowers.

Binding role for Financial Ombudsman

The first bill, amending the law on the establishment and operation of the Unified Body for the Out-of-Court Settlement of Financial Disputes, strengthens the role of the Financial Ombudsman.

It provides that the Ombudsman’s decisions will be binding in disputes involving financial charges, interest rates and similar issues, for amounts up to €20,000.

Option to обратиться insolvency advisor

Under the same proposal, if an eligible debtor seeks verification of their debt through the Financial Ombudsman but no agreement is reached on restructuring or repayment, they will have the option to обратиться to an Insolvency Advisor.

This provision aims to offer an additional pathway for resolving disputes outside the courts.

More time for negotiated solutions

The second bill, amending the law on the transfer and mortgaging of immovable property, introduces changes to foreclosure procedures by extending the time available for reaching a settlement.

Specifically, the process will now begin from the earlier “Letter I” stage, rather than “Letter IA” as currently applied, effectively giving both the Financial Ombudsman and the debtor more time to find a solution before foreclosure progresses.

Focus on early intervention

The proposed changes are designed to facilitate earlier intervention in disputes and increase the likelihood of negotiated outcomes, while strengthening the institutional role of the Financial Ombudsman. The bills are expected to be examined by Parliament in the coming period.

Comments Posting Policy

The owners of the website www.politis.com.cy reserve the right to remove reader comments that are defamatory and/or offensive, or comments that could be interpreted as inciting hate/racism or that violate any other legislation. The authors of these comments are personally responsible for their publication. If a reader/commenter whose comment is removed believes that they have evidence proving the accuracy of its content, they can send it to the website address for review. We encourage our readers to report/flag comments that they believe violate the above rules. Comments that contain URLs/links to any site are not published automatically.