The government's decision to proceed immediately with the appointment of criminal investigators in the Mafia State case was both necessary and unavoidable.
However, speed cannot be the sole measure of success. An investigation of this magnitude must not only be independent; like Caesar's wife, it must also convince society that it is both honest and independent.
The resignation of Christos Mylonopoulos, allegations of potential conflicts of interest and the intense political controversy surrounding the case have already clouded the atmosphere.
By simply replacing him, the government may believe there is no reason to alter its original plan. It cannot, however, expect citizens to accept that assurance without adequate explanations.
When allegations touch on the previous administration, the Law Office and key state institutions, even the slightest perception of dependence or bias can prove deeply damaging.
The five-member team has been tasked with reviewing thousands of pages of testimony and evidence and determining whether criminal offences may have been committed.
This is a demanding assignment that must not be reduced to a routine re-examination of the report's findings. Investigators must have genuine freedom of action, access to all relevant evidence and the authority to summon any individual, regardless of office or political influence.
At the same time, greater transparency is needed regarding the investigators' terms of reference, the selection process and the checks conducted to identify possible conflicts of interest.
Making this information public would not undermine the investigation. On the contrary, transparency is a tool that would strengthen its credibility.
The government is right not to delay.
It must also understand, however, that the objective is not merely to launch the investigation. It is to ensure that the inquiry is completed without any shadow hanging over it and without leaving the impression that the state’s institutions are, once again, investigating themselves.
