PASYEK-PEO has called for an extension of lifeguards' working hours on beaches and the replacement of three-, four- and six-month contracts with 10-month positions, urging the state to adopt a comprehensive approach to lifeguard coverage focused on protecting human life.
In a statement issued on Wednesday, the union said that public debate over lifeguard coverage resurfaces every summer following drowning incidents, but argued that no comprehensive state initiative has been taken to address the problem of staffing shortages on beaches.
According to PASYEK-PEO, the lack of interest in lifeguard positions is mainly linked to the absence of career prospects and job stability.
The union said that on days of high beach attendance, lifeguard towers are often left unmanned and staffing levels are insufficient, resulting in inadequate supervision and protection for bathers.
PASYEK-PEO said it has for years called for the launch of "a serious and comprehensive dialogue" involving all relevant stakeholders, with priority given to "the protection of human lives rather than numbers".
Among its proposals is the extension of lifeguards' working hours in line with beach attendance levels.
The union also calls, as an initial step, for the abolition of six-, four- and three-month positions, arguing that they fail to attract applicants and frequently remain vacant.
It proposes replacing them with 10-month contracts and, at a later stage, creating the conditions necessary for permanent 12-month employment.
During periods of lower beach attendance, the union says lifeguards could undertake training, attend seminars, maintain equipment and assist with other duties depending on the priorities of district administrations.
PASYEK-PEO expressed confidence that creating the right conditions would help address both recruitment difficulties and broader lifeguard planning, stressing that the "value of human life" should take precedence over all other considerations.
Source: CNA
